Proof-Reading request for first draft of card game.

"Each player begins with twenty Life Points. When one player’s Life Points are increase to 20 that player loses, the game is finished, and the other player is victorious."

Should read: Each player begins with twenty Life Points. When one player’s Life Points are reduced to 0 that player loses and the other player is victorious.

- I personally think the cards, as they are now, are difficult to read, due to the scratchy text and the lack of delineation between abilities.

- 44LP on a minion seems high. Reduce values across the board to make numbers smaller/more manageable.

- Having players draw a card at any point during their turn is clunky. Make it mandatory to begin a turn by also drawing a card. There is no reason you wouldn't draw a card first in order to properly plan your turn.

Broad design thoughts:

As your description above states, Nevera Wars is definitely a mix of Pokemon and MtG...which isn't a strong selling point. When I see games try to be a mix of two different games, that's only exciting if the new game also attempts to fix many of the perceived design problems that occur in both games. Nevera Wars doesn't fix mana and doesn't fix evolutions. These are problems because cards rely on mana in order to play/use abilities, and evolutions rely on previous iterations in order to be effective. These issues create the problem of bad hands. Only so much deck tweaking can mitigate this.

I'd recommend you think of ways to solve these issues. Maybe discarding cards from your hand to be used as mana, which helps make evolutions you can't play less detrimental to your strategy? Do evolutions need to be in a deck? Do you even need a deck of cards?

Gameplay wise, an optimal strategy would be to focus each attack on one minion until it dies because there's no reason to spread your damage. Are there ways you can encourage other strategies?

I hope this was of some help!