Skip to Content

Modular Hex Game

2 replies [Last post]
Daggaz
Daggaz's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/19/2016
prototype1.jpg
prototype3.jpg

The game is modular and uses the tried-and-true hex sytem with varying types of land areas, for example grasslands, forests, hills, and mountains. Players will flip hexes from a predefined distribution and place them on the table, and this way the game will always have a certain degree of variability, and hence, replayability.

To make the hexes, I bought a few cheap plastic place-mats for your dining table. The material is thin and stiff, but fairly easy to cut, and I chose a black color. Then I drew a simple hexagonal grid in MSPaint (oh yes), which fills an A4 page, and printed out a few dozen copies. For each land-type, I played around with color pencils trying out different designs which would convey the imagery, while sticking with an overhead view as best as possible (the mountains were tough but I think I got a good solution). The pencils turned out to be time consuming, so for the 'final' product, I switched to my kids' crayons. With these, I colored in the desired pattern on an entire A4 page over the hex-grid outline. Then I took a glue-stick, and glued the A4 page onto the place mat. Turned out, I needed to coat the place-mat first, coat the A4 page next, then press them together. For the most part, it worked but there are a few pieces that have started to peel as Ive playtested: a quick swipe with the glue stick fixes that. After ten minutes the glue was pretty much dry, so I started to cut the hexes out with a pair of scissors.

OK. I would have made the hexes a bit larger in hind-sight, I kept them small then because I was expecting to change things a lot and didnt want to waste material. I also wanted a lot of them. They are about 3 cm from one face to the opposing face, but it is getting crowded on the board and 4 cm would have been better. It also took all night to cut them all. I will definitely draw the grid with the hexes in a star pattern next time, which allows you to use only straight cuts instead of turning the scissors. It wastes some material, but wow it's definitely worth the time saved and you probably get slightly more regular hexagons that way.

But it worked, I had a ton of hexes and it really opened up the development side of things, as now I had plenty of real estate on which to try out different ideas and mechanics.

I made extra blanks for random ideas, and saved plenty of material for major changes, but for now the hexes are done. The next step was the flip-tiles. I decided I wanted some kind of tokens or tiles which would be placed face down on the hexes, and the player would have to use actions to explore and flip them over, to see what was hidden there.

Now here I was less concrete with my ideas, so I was a lot more cautious in my expenditures. I also wanted something that was easy to flip without a lot of fuss. I settled for good old cardboard. I chose a flatscreen television box, the cardboard has a decent thickness, about 0.5 cm, and is pretty stiff. I want circles or smaller hexes for the final product, but screw that now. I cut small squares, making sure the hexes could fully inscribe them. First I glue-sticked paper with the square grid onto the cardboard, then I cut them out. The scissors split the paper a bit, it looks ugly so I will definitely use an exacto (razor) knife next time. Now I just quickly drew on rough sketches of the monsters I wanted, or failing that, simply wrote the name on each tile. Like I said, fast and ugly, and I was right; I ended up changing these a lot and am still not done.

For some other information in the game, a deck of normal cards was more suitable than homemade tiles, so I just bought some A4 printer-stickers (dont buy small stickers they are horribly expensive), cut them to playing card size, and covered over the faces. Now I can quickly scribble on different ideas, and the better ones I have inked in with some nice colored drawing pens.

Next, I needed playing pieces. Here I used a bit more money. I want to be comfortable using them, I want to get a good feel of things and it should look a little bit nice and be easy to recognise. So I went down to the local game shop, and they have bulk-bins of plastic and wooden pieces, and I chose some wooden items for houses and army units and the like, in various team-colors. I think I spent a good 40 dollars (a bit expensive but I got a bag of 200+) and I am sure I could have saved some money shopping online, but I wanted them ASAP and felt like it was a good investment. Besides, they are durable and I can use them in my next game-design project as well.

Finally, I needed a player's card. Here I just drew up a basic design in MSPaint, printed it out, and added some art by hand. Dice I have lying around of various sorts, though I am trying to stick with d6's for marketing purposes, and I robbed some plastic chips from my old Axis n Allies game for stacking units.

So there it is, and it worked! My gf actually enjoys playtesting with me (she has never played anything like this before, I had to explain what hitpoints were), so I take that as a good sign. My experience so far has been very positive. I would definitely recommend getting a physical prototype in your hands sooner than later, and it can be rewarding to spend a little time/money on the parts that you are more certain will be in your game, or which at least can be re-used in future projects.

BHFuturist
BHFuturist's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/01/2008
Nice!

I think this is great! I do love to see how people are making their prototypes. It helps in so many ways. I agree while it might have cost a bit to get the parts but now you have more than you need and that is not a bad problem to have.

You are right about getting to a physical version of the game as soon as possible. the ideas in your head are frail and without form. once it is on the table the way you think about things changes a lot and then refining the idea is a lot easier.

Full sheet stickers are also a good call, I wish I had known that from the start...

Placemats!! What a neat material choice!

Have you considered GIMP rather than MS Paint? It is free and not hard to learn, and just as powerful as photoshop. Just a thought.


This makes me want to know more about the game. It looks like an adventure of epic proportions... Keep working it and posting about it, I think you have something interesting here.

Thanks for taking the time to share!

Now I need to look through the novel you wrote, back in that other thread, lol. I will try and get some pictures of my prototype together once the parts are made. Right now they are just scratches of ink on paper.

@BHFuturist

Daggaz
Daggaz's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/19/2016
GIMP? I will definitely have

GIMP? I will definitely have to look into that, for my PhD as well.

Yeah the game is somewhat epic in a sense. I was a huge fan of Axis-and-Allies and a friend and I spent years replaying it until we had broken it down in every way possible, both tangibly and conceptually. The need to correct some of the more egregious errors in Avalon's game design, things that lie at the very core of territory-capture strategy games, is what drove me here.

So for years I've built up an over-all game concept in my head that would deconstruct various shortcomings and replace them with a new blend of mechanics designed to keep the _game_ going, without sacrificing balance, and without dulling that edge that strategists are looking for, which is the ability to make very meaningful decisions based on complex information that ultimately prove their superiority. One move pushes you in one direction, you find a new problem, you get pushed back or try to fix it and end in an entirely new place, and so it goes on..

It sounds a bit ambitious I know, and it is far from a complete concept at this point in time. To keep things from getting out of hand, I have kept as an absolute core design principle the idea that the game should be as simple as possible at all steps. The rules can be written down in a few pages, the gameplay is emergent to the greatest extent possible.

I have a solid base now where the player starts with very few units and must take risks in order to expand. By capturing resources, you can increase your action economy and expand your forces. As the player spreads out and grows stronger, the game naturally evolves to keep them in check as the immediate goals change. In the early game, you are trying to conserve your units and put down farms. Suddenly you find you have armies and are building defensive structures and begin to eye the larger prizes.

All of this is happening in parallel with the other players, who are expanding towards your own lands, and suddenly you realize that your armies are all that stand between you and defeat.

Right now I am still working on the game evolution, but I can have two very different players suffer through a very different range of fortune (there is a lot of hidden information in this game, but more than enough is revealed to make strategic decisions very meaningful), and quite often the two teams arrive into midgame-conditions at roughly the same time, albeit carrying very different strengths and weaknesses to their position. I like that. It smacks of good balance.

Syndicate content


forum | by Dr. Radut