Use this thread for any comments, questions, requests for clarity, etc., regarding the January 2013 Challenge in the Game Design Showdown, entitled ["Big Ideas in Tiny Packages."](http://bgdf.com/node/13776)
-Rich
Use this thread for any comments, questions, requests for clarity, etc., regarding the January 2013 Challenge in the Game Design Showdown, entitled ["Big Ideas in Tiny Packages."](http://bgdf.com/node/13776)
-Rich
Please pardon my ignorance, but how do fossil fuels and renewable energy sources fit in with the title of the challenge?
Power Grid fits this theme perfectly so take a look at it if you want a better idea about how the theme can be incorporated. Don't copy the game for the showdown obviously, but it is a great example.
What I'm asking is why is the challenge called "Big Ideas in Tiny Packages", when the challenge has nothing to do with packaging?
Crystal clear.
Sunday comes to a close for many of you, and the week is full of activity. Wouldn't it be easier to do a quick design today rather than the middle of the week?
Entries due on the 8th!
This is now Wednesday the 8th, so entries must be in before midnight tonight! We have a lot of competition this month, so if you've been holding off you'd better come up with something "unique" to stand out.
What time zone are you talking about?
Eastern time. Which is now past :)
All the entries for this month are posted.
New-comers, You'll notice that at least a couple entries have more a "game flavor" statement than outright rules descriptions. This is perfectly fine and in-line with the GDS. When considering entries such as these it can be difficult to judge as one can't see the mechanics of it all. Look at other facets of the game, such as does it meet the GDS theme? Does it seem like compelling choices can be made? Is the "feel" of the description good enough to get you interested in the game?
For entries with standard rule-sets, you should of course consider the above alongside how the presented mechanics work and flow within the theme of the GDS.
Good luck to all the entrants this month, and happy voting!
Time zones be what they are, there is one more entry on the list now. That'll teach me to post early. Lucky number 13.
Can you vote if you didn't submit one?
Yes, I've done so several times. It's just that people who did submit HAVE to vote or have pyrite medals that deduct points. If you feel the urge to vote, you're quite welcome.
Only if you vote for mine. :)
Hi,
I'm new to this whole challenge thing. What is the criteria used for voting? Is it my own subjectivity or are we supposed to judge entries on certain criteria ideally?
Thanks,
David
Here's some of the details from the general GDS description.
Unless otherwise stated in the challenge, the entries do not need to be "fully completed and tested" rule sets ... there should be enough of a description, rules, examples, etc., to give other readers a good "feel" for the game ... the extent to which an author wishes to go is up to him -- it will be the voting of the readers that will decide the winner
Voting criteria is as subjective as it gets ... each voter is asked to vote for the "best entry" in his/her eyes -- however he/she wishes to determine that
Keeping that in mind ... be original, be clear, be creative, be entertaining ... this is, essentially, a popularity contest where your ideas, written in words, will be what makes you popular (or not)
Besides that, it seems like everyone has their own way of evaluating the entries. Some people have posted scores based on their own categories - clarity, fun, mechanics, etc. The one thing that everyone seems to apply is whether or not the submission meets the GDS requirements (EDIT - which is hugely subjective), but outside of that, it really seems about whatever floats your boat.
While it's not required, I feel that people who can not only give a good feel, but also a complete rule set in the limit of 500 words and still get a hugely entertaining and deep game, deserve bonus points for that particular skill. It's very hard to do, so people who can get extra points from me.
The above posters nailed the voting "criteria," such as it is.
I've been spending some quality time reviewing this month's entries. In my opinion, there are a lot of really strong entries this month.
Just sayin'
![]() | PoA — Improving the Design (21) by questccg |
![]() | Winner Announced for VHS Case Challenge! (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | What are "Factions"??? Are they UNITS per Faction or something else??? (35) by X3M |
![]() | 1d6 is all you need (4) by X3M |
![]() | Game Designer's Ruler (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | New Staff Pick at The Game Crafter - The Fall of Oakhaven (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Board Game Blueprint - New Episode Every Wednesday (41) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | New Board Game Pieces - Premium Deflector Shield & Premium Trash Can (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Walls? To give cover, or not to give cover? (21) by X3M |
![]() | Sir Thecos Unboxes 7 Tabletop Games from The Game Crafter (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Tariffs and The Game Crafter (3) by larienna |
![]() | Game design project management platforms (2) by X3M |
![]() | Trying to Learn to use Vassal (5) by larienna |
![]() | Protospiel Kansas City 2025 (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Do-It-Yourself Dice Kit (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Cinco De Mayo Sale at The Game Crafter (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | What generic prototype components are worth keeping? (3) by X3M |
![]() | Bulk Order Queue Update (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Toy Business Unboxed Podcast - The Power of Personal Branding with JT Smith, The Willy Wonka of Tabletop Industry (1) by questccg |
![]() | Proto ATL 2025 - Started Today! (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Protospiel Indy 2025 (0) by sirvalence |
![]() | New Board Game Pieces - Premium Pile of Bones & Premium Tentacle (0) by The Game Crafter |
![]() | Kingdom of ... (12) by questccg |
![]() | PoA — Major shift back closer to FCE (17) by questccg |
![]() | Solo racing game: Stunt racing (5) by larienna |
Anonymousmagic, You're on the right idea there by thinking literally. "Tiny packaging" as in a game's packaging. Fitting big ideas (evolution, energy crisises, disease vectors, etc) into a simple, playable experience.
The spirit of this theme is to examine the global issues, controversies, and various proposed solutions surrounding energy. Try to think social conscience and education here more than straight economic simulator.
Clear as mud?